Skip to main content

Envisioning is a research institute that studies how institutions adapt to technological change.

LinkedIn Instagram GitHub

Since 2010

Observatory
Adaptive capacity
Hindsight
Newsletter
Methodology
Origins
Vocab
RSS feeds

Signals Session
Bespoke Projects
Build Sessions
Pricing
Use cases
Signals
Signal Scanfree

ANBIMAFuture of Brazilian Capital Markets
IEEECharting the Energy Transition
Horizon 2045Future of Human and Planetary Security
WKOTechnology Scanning for Austria

solutions

Innovation
Strategy
Consultants
Foresight
Associations
Governments
L&D

resources

Partners
Coding for Non-Coders
Git for non-coders
How we work
Data visualization
Multi-Model Convergence
FAQ
Security and privacy
Public sector

Manifesto
Community
Events
Support
Contact

Research Capability Services Signals About

Research Capability Services Signals About

Self-healing materials · Hindsight | Envisioning

Hindsight
Envisioning
Envisioning Technology posters
2011
Claim

Self-healing materials

Published 2011-08

Publishers Forecast vs actual Side by side

Self-healing materials becomes mainstream around 2025

Verdict

Graded through its 2012 placement: et-2012-018

The same forecast in other editions

20112015-2025 yrs
2012Self-healing materials

In our research

CitiesSelf-healing Material
HorizonsSelf-healing Material
HabitatSelf-Healing Materials
ForgeSelf-Healing Materials & Adaptive Structures

All captured fields

id: et-2011-041
category: MATERIALS
kind: technology
band: 2015-2025
year min: 2015
year max: 2025
placed year: 2025
confidence: high
note: Band 2015–2025 (r≈276 pt).
graded via: et-2012-018
successor placed year: 2014

Permalink

https://www.envisioning.com/hindsight/claims/envisioning-technology-2011-041

Cite

Hindsight, claim envisioning-technology-2011-041, not graded as of 2026-10-03. Envisioning. https://www.envisioning.com/hindsight/claims/envisioning-technology-2011-041

Dispute this verdict

Data, code and grading rules are public at github.com/envisioning/hindsight. Data under CC BY 4.0 (the BCB Focus survey under ODbL), code under MIT. Every rule is in the decision log. Think a verdict is wrong? Open a dispute.

successor verdict

miss