Skip to main content

Envisioning is a research institute that studies how institutions adapt to technological change.

LinkedIn Instagram GitHub

Since 2010

Observatory
Adaptive capacity
Hindsight
Newsletter
Methodology
Origins
Vocab
RSS feeds

Signals Session
Bespoke Projects
Build Sessions
Pricing
Use cases
Signals
Signal Scanfree

ANBIMAFuture of Brazilian Capital Markets
IEEECharting the Energy Transition
Horizon 2045Future of Human and Planetary Security
WKOTechnology Scanning for Austria

solutions

Innovation
Strategy
Consultants
Foresight
Associations
Governments
L&D

resources

Partners
Coding for Non-Coders
Git for non-coders
How we work
Data visualization
Multi-Model Convergence
FAQ
Security and privacy
Public sector

Manifesto
Community
Events
Support
Contact

Research Capability Services Signals About

Research Capability Services Signals About

wind · Hindsight | Envisioning

Hindsight · review build · data not yet validated

wind

International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook, 2017, published 2017-11

Publishers Envisioning Hype Cycle explorer Forecast vs actual

wind, generation in 2040: 4270 TWh

Verdict

Not graded yet.

The same forecast in other editions

20143345 TWh
20153568 TWh
20163881 TWh
20174270 TWh
20184690 TWh
20195226 TWh
20205441 TWh
20216628 TWh
20228107 TWh
20239275 TWh
20249492 TWh
20258609 TWh

All captured fields

technology: wind
metric: generation
target year: 2040
value: 4270
unit: TWh
scenario: New Policies Scenario
main scenario: true
claim type: forecast
confidence: high
position: Annex A, World: New Policies Scenario, electricity generation and electrical capacity

Permalink

https://www.envisioning.com/hindsight/claims/iea-weo-2017-010

Cite

Hindsight, claim iea-weo-2017-010. Envisioning. https://www.envisioning.com/hindsight/claims/iea-weo-2017-010

Dispute this verdict

Data, code and grading rules are public at github.com/envisioning/hindsight. Data under CC BY 4.0 (the BCB Focus survey under ODbL), code under MIT. Every rule is in the decision log. Think a verdict is wrong? Open a dispute.