Skip to main content

Envisioning is a research institute that studies how institutions adapt to technological change.

LinkedIn Instagram GitHub

Since 2010

Observatory
Adaptive capacity
Hindsight
Newsletter
Methodology
Origins
Vocab
RSS feeds

Signals Session
Bespoke Projects
Build Sessions
Pricing
Use cases
Signals
Signal Scanfree

ANBIMAFuture of Brazilian Capital Markets
IEEECharting the Energy Transition
Horizon 2045Future of Human and Planetary Security
WKOTechnology Scanning for Austria

solutions

Innovation
Strategy
Consultants
Foresight
Associations
Governments
L&D

resources

Partners
Coding for Non-Coders
Git for non-coders
How we work
Data visualization
Multi-Model Convergence
FAQ
Security and privacy
Public sector

Manifesto
Community
Events
Support
Contact

Research Capability Services Signals About

Research Capability Services Signals About

wind · Hindsight | Envisioning

Hindsight · review build · data not yet validated

wind

International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook, 2017, published 2017-11

Publishers Envisioning Hype Cycle explorer Forecast vs actual

wind, generation in 2030: 2837 TWh

Verdict

Not graded yet.

The same forecast in other editions

2002539 TWh
2004929 TWh
20061132 TWh
20071287 TWh
20081490 TWh
20091535 TWh
20102278 TWh
20112182 TWh
20122187 TWh
20132269 TWh
20142362 TWh
20152535 TWh
20162706 TWh
20172837 TWh
20183157 TWh
20193317 TWh
20203361 TWh
20214102 TWh
20224604 TWh
20235229 TWh
20245024 TWh

All captured fields

technology: wind
metric: generation
target year: 2030
value: 2837
unit: TWh
scenario: New Policies Scenario
main scenario: true
claim type: forecast
confidence: high
position: Annex A, World: New Policies Scenario, electricity generation and electrical capacity

Permalink

https://www.envisioning.com/hindsight/claims/iea-weo-2017-008

Cite

Hindsight, claim iea-weo-2017-008. Envisioning. https://www.envisioning.com/hindsight/claims/iea-weo-2017-008

Dispute this verdict

Data, code and grading rules are public at github.com/envisioning/hindsight. Data under CC BY 4.0 (the BCB Focus survey under ODbL), code under MIT. Every rule is in the decision log. Think a verdict is wrong? Open a dispute.