Skip to main content

Envisioning is a research institute that studies how institutions adapt to technological change.

LinkedIn Instagram GitHub

Since 2010

Observatory
Adaptive capacity
Hindsight
Newsletter
Methodology
Origins
Vocab
RSS feeds

Signals Session
Bespoke Projects
Build Sessions
Pricing
Use cases
Signals
Signal Scanfree

ANBIMAFuture of Brazilian Capital Markets
IEEECharting the Energy Transition
Horizon 2045Future of Human and Planetary Security
WKOTechnology Scanning for Austria

solutions

Innovation
Strategy
Consultants
Foresight
Associations
Governments
L&D

resources

Partners
Coding for Non-Coders
Git for non-coders
How we work
Data visualization
Multi-Model Convergence
FAQ
Security and privacy
Public sector

Manifesto
Community
Events
Support
Contact

Research Capability Services Signals About

Research Capability Services Signals About

wind · Hindsight | Envisioning

Hindsight · review build · data not yet validated

wind

International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook, 2012, published 2012-11

Publishers Envisioning Hype Cycle explorer Forecast vs actual

wind, installed capacity in 2030: 924 GW

Verdict

Not graded yet.

The same forecast in other editions

2002195 GW
2004328 GW
2006430 GW
2008551 GW
2009600 GW
2010862 GW
2011921 GW
2012924 GW
2013960 GW
2014982 GW
20151046 GW
20161119 GW
20171174 GW
20181250 GW
20191288 GW
20201299 GW
20211603 GW
20221830 GW
20232064 GW
20242079 GW

All captured fields

technology: wind
metric: installed capacity
target year: 2030
value: 924
unit: GW
scenario: New Policies Scenario
main scenario: true
claim type: forecast
confidence: high
position: Annex A, World: New Policies Scenario, electricity generation and electrical capacity

Permalink

https://www.envisioning.com/hindsight/claims/iea-weo-2012-023

Cite

Hindsight, claim iea-weo-2012-023. Envisioning. https://www.envisioning.com/hindsight/claims/iea-weo-2012-023

Dispute this verdict

Data, code and grading rules are public at github.com/envisioning/hindsight. Data under CC BY 4.0 (the BCB Focus survey under ODbL), code under MIT. Every rule is in the decision log. Think a verdict is wrong? Open a dispute.