
The trust-based philanthropy movement represents a fundamental reimagining of how philanthropic capital flows between funders and grantees, challenging decades of conventional grant-making practice. At its core, this approach shifts away from the traditional model of restricted, project-specific funding with extensive reporting requirements toward unrestricted, multi-year grants that give nonprofit organizations greater autonomy over how they deploy resources. The movement is built on several key principles: providing general operating support rather than project-restricted funding, offering multi-year commitments that allow organizations to plan beyond annual cycles, streamlining application and reporting processes to reduce administrative burden, and cultivating genuine partnerships characterized by transparency and mutual learning rather than hierarchical oversight. This framework acknowledges that nonprofit leaders closest to the work often have the best understanding of how to allocate resources effectively, and that the traditional philanthropic model—with its emphasis on detailed proposals, narrow funding restrictions, and extensive compliance reporting—can actually undermine organizational effectiveness by consuming staff time, constraining strategic flexibility, and perpetuating power imbalances between funders and grantees.
The problems this movement addresses are deeply embedded in philanthropic practice and have significant consequences for nonprofit effectiveness. Traditional grant-making often requires organizations to dedicate substantial staff time to crafting detailed proposals, managing multiple restricted funding streams, and producing extensive reports that may not align with their own learning needs. Research suggests that nonprofits can spend up to 40% of their time on funder compliance activities, diverting resources from mission-critical work. Moreover, the prevalence of project-specific funding creates chronic underfunding of core operational expenses like technology infrastructure, staff development, and financial reserves, leaving organizations fragile and unable to adapt to changing circumstances. The power dynamics inherent in traditional philanthropy—where funders set narrow priorities, impose rigid timelines, and demand extensive accountability while offering little transparency about their own decision-making—can undermine the agency and expertise of community-based organizations. Trust-based philanthropy seeks to address these systemic issues by redistributing power, reducing transaction costs, and enabling nonprofits to operate with greater strategic autonomy and organizational resilience.
The movement has gained significant momentum in recent years, evolving from a fringe practice among a handful of family foundations to a recognized framework being adopted by community foundations, corporate funders, and even some large institutional philanthropies. The Trust-Based Philanthropy Project, launched in 2020, has documented hundreds of funders making commitments to trust-based practices, while research from organizations like the Center for Effective Philanthropy provides growing evidence that unrestricted funding and simplified processes correlate with stronger grantee outcomes and satisfaction. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated adoption as many funders temporarily relaxed restrictions and reporting requirements, with some making these changes permanent after seeing positive results. Current applications range from disaster response—where unrestricted funding allows rapid adaptation to evolving needs—to long-term systems change work that requires patient capital and organizational stability. Looking forward, the movement faces the challenge of scaling beyond early adopters to transform mainstream philanthropic practice, requiring changes not just in individual funder behavior but in the broader infrastructure of philanthropy, including donor expectations, legal frameworks, and sector norms around accountability and impact measurement.
A peer-to-peer funder initiative to address the inherent power imbalances between foundations and nonprofits.
A major American private foundation that has recently pivoted its strategy toward inequality and supporting local civil society.
The philanthropic vehicle of MacKenzie Scott, characterized by massive, unrestricted, upfront giving with high velocity.
A foundation focused on leadership development and systems change in New York City.
A foundation that funds grassroots organizing led by women, youth, and Indigenous Peoples in the Global South.
A global champion for the human rights of women and girls that utilizes flexible, general support funding.
A Montana-based health foundation that was built from the ground up using trust-based principles (e.g., no written proposals for some grants).
A family foundation based in Palo Alto that advocates for 'grantee-centric' philanthropy and radical transparency.
A family foundation focused on human rights that has shifted its entire strategy to trust-based, unrestricted funding for BIPOC organizations.
Cloud-based grant management software that connects givers and doers, using automation to streamline compliance, reporting, and data aggregation for foundations.