Skip to main content

Envisioning is a research institute that studies how institutions adapt to technological change.

LinkedIn Instagram GitHub

Since 2010

Observatory
Adaptive capacity
Hindsight
Newsletter
Methodology
Origins
Vocab
RSS feeds

Signals Session
Bespoke Projects
Build Sessions
Pricing
Use cases
Signals
Signal Scanfree

ANBIMAFuture of Brazilian Capital Markets
IEEECharting the Energy Transition
Horizon 2045Future of Human and Planetary Security
WKOTechnology Scanning for Austria

solutions

Innovation
Strategy
Consultants
Foresight
Associations
Governments
L&D

resources

Partners
Coding for Non-Coders
Git for non-coders
How we work
Data visualization
Multi-Model Convergence
FAQ
Security and privacy
Public sector

Manifesto
Community
Events
Support
Contact

Research Capability Services Signals About

Research Capability Services Signals About

IPCA · Hindsight | Envisioning

Hindsight · review build · data not yet validated

IPCA

Banco Central do Brasil, Focus market expectations survey, 2023-06, published 2023-06-30

Publishers Envisioning Hype Cycle explorer Forecast vs actual

Brazil, IPCA inflation, December to December in 2024: 3.92 %

Verdict

Not graded yet.

The same forecast in other editions

2023-034.1335 %
2023-063.92 %
2023-093.871 %
2023-123.9 %
2024-033.7506 %
2024-064.0046 %
2024-094.3638 %
2024-124.8938 %

All captured fields

economy: Brazil
economy code: BRA
metric: IPCA inflation, December to December
subject: brazil-ipca-inflation
statistic: median
target year: 2024
horizon: next_year
value: 3.92
unit: %
survey date: 2023-06-30
respondents: 151
base calculo

Permalink

https://www.envisioning.com/hindsight/claims/bcb-focus-2023-06-002

Cite

Hindsight, claim bcb-focus-2023-06-002. Envisioning. https://www.envisioning.com/hindsight/claims/bcb-focus-2023-06-002

Dispute this verdict

Data, code and grading rules are public at github.com/envisioning/hindsight. Data under CC BY 4.0 (the BCB Focus survey under ODbL), code under MIT. Every rule is in the decision log. Think a verdict is wrong? Open a dispute.

0

confidence

high