# MIT Technology Review · Hindsight | Envisioning

Source: https://www.envisioning.com/hindsight/mit-technology-review

---

---

1.  [Hindsight](/hindsight)
2.  ›MIT Technology Review

---

# MIT Technology Review

Every publication series from MIT Technology Review in Hindsight, and how its predictions turned out.

---
[Publishers](/hindsight)[Forecast vs actual](/hindsight/forecasts)[Side by side](/hindsight/comparisons)
---

[10 Breakthrough Technologies](/hindsight/mit-technology-review/10-breakthrough-technologies)Technology placements

Validated: two blind graders, an adjudicator on every disagreement, and an agent audit of a fixed sample ([D20](https://github.com/envisioning/hindsight/blob/main/docs/DECISIONS.md#d20-agents-do-all-grading-adjudication-and-audit-amends-d7-d11)).

25 publications, 2001 to 2026 · 254 predictions

48%

050%100%

hit rate, 31 of 65, 95% interval 31% to 65% with the audit error applied ([D28](https://github.com/envisioning/hindsight/blob/main/docs/DECISIONS.md#d28-the-audit-error-rate-widens-every-published-interval-d11-issue-61))

Light band: with the audit error. Dark bar: count-only interval 36% to 60%.

-   hit31
-   partial11
-   miss23
-   ungradable3
-   contested3

1.  71claims
    
    each graded by two agents who cannot see each other's verdict ([D7](https://github.com/envisioning/hindsight/blob/main/docs/DECISIONS.md#d7-agentic-verdicts-with-independent-agreement))
    
2.  →
    
    60agreed
    
    agreement beyond chance, kappa 0.77
    
3.  →
    
    11settled
    
    the graders disagreed; a third agent decided ([D20](https://github.com/envisioning/hindsight/blob/main/docs/DECISIONS.md#d20-agents-do-all-grading-adjudication-and-audit-amends-d7-d11))
    
4.  →
    
    59audited
    
    an agent re-checked a fixed sample of agreed verdicts: 0 corrected, 3 left unsettled ([D11](https://github.com/envisioning/hindsight/blob/main/docs/DECISIONS.md#d11-validation-thresholds))
    
5.  →
    
    68published
    
    3 contested: no verdict publishes
    

How testable the claims were

4% no public measure

3 of 71. ungradable: nothing measures what the claim states at its date.

---
Data, code and grading rules are public at [github.com/envisioning/hindsight](https://github.com/envisioning/hindsight). Data under CC BY 4.0 (the BCB Focus survey under ODbL), code under MIT. Every rule is in [the decision log](https://github.com/envisioning/hindsight/blob/main/docs/DECISIONS.md). Think a verdict is wrong? [Open a dispute](https://github.com/envisioning/hindsight/issues/new?template=dispute-verdict.yml).
---