Intergenerational Governance for Long-Lived Interventions

Institutions that internalize long-term impacts of infrastructure and geoengineering.
Intergenerational Governance for Long-Lived Interventions

Long-lived infrastructure, nuclear waste repositories, and geoengineering proposals can outlast political cycles by centuries. Intergenerational governance frameworks create institutions—future generations ombudspersons, citizens’ assemblies, constitutionally mandated climate councils—that scrutinize decisions through a multi-decade lens. They employ scenario planning, discount-rate reforms, and social cost of carbon updates to ensure today’s benefits do not impose disproportionate risks on descendants. Legal tools include rights-of-nature statutes, intergenerational trusts, and judicial doctrines allowing youth to sue governments for inadequate climate action.

Countries like Wales, Hungary, and Germany have already appointed future generations commissioners; Pacific Island nations experiment with cultural guardianship councils overseeing long-term adaptation. Infrastructure approvals can require legacy stewardship funds, fail-safe designs, and clear decom missioning plans, while geoengineering research proposals must detail monitoring for decades. Digital archives, storytelling, and indigenous legal frameworks preserve knowledge so future caretakers understand intent and constraints.

This governance mode is TRL 2–3, but climate litigation, constitutional amendments, and youth movements are accelerating adoption. Embedding intergenerational safeguards into permitting, finance, and treaty obligations will help societies manage irreversible interventions responsibly.

TRL
2/9Theoretical
Impact
4/5
Investment
1/5
Category
Ethics & Security
Governance, equity, and the societal impact of climate intervention.