Skip to main content

Envisioning is a research institute that studies how institutions adapt to technological change.

LinkedInInstagramGitHub

Since 2010

research
  • Observatory
  • Adaptive capacity
  • Newsletter
  • Methodology
  • Origins
  • Vocab
  • RSS feeds
services
  • Signals Session
  • Bespoke Projects
  • Build Sessions
  • Pricing
  • Use cases
  • Signals
  • Signal Scan↗free
impact
  • ANBIMAFuture of Brazilian Capital Markets
  • IEEECharting the Energy Transition
  • Horizon 2045Future of Human and Planetary Security
  • WKOTechnology Scanning for Austria
solutions
  • Innovation
  • Strategy
  • Consultants
  • Foresight
  • Associations
  • Governments
  • L&D
resources
  • Partners
  • Coding for Non-Coders
  • How we work
  • Data visualization
  • Multi-Model Convergence
  • FAQ
  • Security and privacy
  • Public sector
about
  • Manifesto
  • Community
  • Events
  • Support
  • Contact
ResearchCapabilityServicesSignalsAbout
ResearchCapabilityServicesSignalsAbout
  1. Home
  2. Vocab
  3. SoL-Pi

SoL-Pi

A set of four automatically discovered agent-harness optimizations, covering action execution, context compaction, observation handling, and delegated reading, that cut coding-agent token traffic by roughly 45% at comparable task performance.

Year: 2026Generality: 300Added: Sep 20, 2026
Back to Vocab

SoL-Pi is a set of coding-agent harness optimizations introduced by Haozhe Liu and coauthors from NVIDIA, Nanyang Technological University, and MIT in "SoL-Pi: Recursively Scaling Auto-Research Loops for Efficient Agent Harness" (arXiv:2609.20519, September 2026). Instead of hand-designing how a coding agent's harness manages tool calls, context, and observations, the authors run an "RSI-inspired" auto-research loop: many candidate harness modifications are tried across a large and diverse set of coding environments, and only the modifications that keep improving results across that whole range, rather than just one setting, survive.

Four mechanisms survived this process and make up SoL-Pi. They span action execution, context compaction, observation handling, and delegated reading, which offloads part of the work of reading and summarizing tool output to a separate step. None of them change the underlying language model's weights. They change only the harness code that decides what the agent reads, remembers, and acts on between steps.

On the 51-task EdgeBench evaluation, SoL-Pi matches the task performance of an existing harness called Pi across two different underlying models, GPT-5.6 Sol and Opus 5, while reducing recorded token traffic by 44.7 to 49.0% and API cost by about one third. The authors estimate this saves roughly $8.75 to $13.50 per hour compared with running the same models through the native Codex or Claude Code harnesses, and $4.36 to $5.71 per hour compared with Pi.

Sources

  1. SoL-Pi: Recursively Scaling Auto-Research Loops for Efficient Agent Harness

    arXiv · Sep 17, 2026

  2. SoL-Pi: Recursively Scaling Auto-Research Loops for Efficient Agent Harness

    Hugging Face · Sep 16, 2026

  3. SoL-Pi: Recursively Scaling Auto-Research Loops for Efficient Agent Harness (HTML)

    arXiv · Sep 17, 2026

Research this in Signals

Scan SoL-Pi for yourself.

Signals turns a topic into a sourced research record you can inspect and rerun. Your first scan is free, and this one starts with SoL-Pi already loaded, so edit it or scan as is.